Mindless Bull
lol

X CLOSE
+
              Home    Message Archive Theme

To tell you the truth…

I never understood why people were hating on Desiree during the time when she was dating Roc, all she basically did was gloat about her boyfriend. 

hell, if my boyfriend was a celebrity I would sooo gloat about it. Not just gloat about it but annoy people about it. 

Q: I'm not referring to the victim consenting to the rapist, but to someone who they actually love, and want to have sex with. I never blame the victim at all for anything,not having the energy/heart to fight off a rapist is not consent. You can't "consent" to a rapist because that is oxymoronic. Rape is being unwillingly forced into sexual activity. I've always seen consent as purposely allowing someone access for mutual pleasure. There is a major difference in "liking it rough" and rape

I think you’re starting to get the point. just to make it clear though “consent is sexy” is was brought up by white, middle-class, sex-posi feminist who thought this would raise awareness, when really it’s offensive to it’s victims.  They never used it for people who loved each other.  but you are right, you can’t give consent to a rapist, which is the problem I’m trying to address. “liking it rough” and rape sort of do fall into the same category, especially if it does involve fetishes. but if I continue to talk about this I honestly go into “stereotypes and sex”, problems with in the porn industry, and sex work.  

asked by Anonymous
Q: I guess I'm not fully understanding because I was blessed enough to not be in such a horrid situation. However I don't see it as saying that victims of rape are undeserving of consent, but that when they do they'd be considered even more beautiful. Then how does finding consent appealing portray rape as cute...

"However I don’t see it as saying that victims of rape are undeserving of consent, but that when they do they’d be considered even more beautiful."

See. What you just said is another reason why this whole “consent is sexy” is offensive. It puts blame on the victim saying that if they (the victim) had only consented, their attack would’ve been considered “sexy”. Consent should be about preventing rape not making it  ”sexier”. I know you probably mean no harm by it but  this is basically why people should stop saying that.

The reason why it portrays rape as “cute” is because it can lead to fetishes.  it trivializes something as serious and traumatizing as rape as “not so serious and  traumatizing”.

asked by Anonymous
Q: But what way is it undermining it if you're referring to it as sexy? Usually when sonething is thought of as sexy, it is given a certain power; an awareness is presented, nearly praised-attention is brought to consent, not away

because by saying “consent is sexy” is telling survivors of sexual abuse that they are undeserving of “consent”. Not only that but it plays off rape as “cute”. 

asked by Anonymous
Q: How is saying that consent is sexy offensive when you're basically just saying that you're only attracted to who actually willingly wants sex.

because it undermines the importance of the term “consent”. 

asked by Anonymous

"Consent is sexy"-It’s offensive to rape victims

"slut-shaming"-you are still calling that person a slut.

So I know I haven’t been on this tag for weeks now, sorry.

My opinion on this is, if a woman finds out that she is pregnant and she does not want to be, then she could have an abortion.

This even isn’t about JFK or John Lennon

dani-misfit-prince-prod:

My main point is they are all in heaven resting in peace and paradise mindlesmybehaviour and mindlesschicka24 you’re arguing in my post about something you’re completely missing a point about which is they are in heaven they made mistakes everybody makes mistakes. Everybody isn’t perfect

My point was They are happily rested in heaven .

Okay dani, we are having a discussion, if this was an argument, we’d be calling you an idiot. Also, JFK was trying to get the black people on his side for politics, he wouldn’t even care for the rights of black people if his brother hadn’t pushed him. John Lennon was a wife beater.

All the great peace makers are in heaven now

dani-misfit-prince-prod:

mindlesmybehavior:

mindlesmybehavior:

dani-misfit-prince-prod:

mindlesmybehavior:

dani-misfit-prince-prod:

John Lennon

Martin Luther

Ghandi

JFK

Now Nelson

John Lennon only sang about peace. He would normally beat his wife and children….the 2 people who deserved peace the most. Everyone…

…. -_-….
He was a wife beater do you not understand? Are you really trying make it seem as though he was a peaceful person? While he was out promoting “peace”, at home, he was still physically and emotionally abusing his wife and child. Stop trying to sugar coat it. John Lennon was a hypocrite of his own words.

OMFG he still wanted peace after wards I don’t have time for an explanation on how he was hypocrite because I already knew but he still wanted peace you’re making a big deal on my post about something it shouldn’t . My point is they are in heaven now I’m not looking for an argument you’re dismissed

I’m not looking for an argument either but you are putting John Lennon on the same level as MLK, Ghandi, and Nelson Mandela. Those three went through hell to get their freedom.

All the great peace makers are in heaven now

mindlesmybehavior:

dani-misfit-prince-prod:

mindlesmybehavior:

dani-misfit-prince-prod:

John Lennon

Martin Luther

Ghandi

JFK

Now Nelson

John Lennon only sang about peace. He would normally beat his wife and children….the 2 people who deserved peace the most. Everyone…

…. -_-….
He was a wife beater do you not understand? Are you really trying make it seem as though he was a peaceful person? While he was out promoting “peace”, at home, he was still physically and emotionally abusing his wife and child. Stop trying to sugar coat it. John Lennon was a hypocrite of his own words.